With StrataGraft, you can heal without harvesting
StrataGraft® is the first approved donor site–free alternative to autograft for deep partial-thickness (DPT) burns
Coprimary end point
StrataGraft is a single-procedure DPT burn treatment that was shown in the pivotal trial to eliminate donor site harvesting in
96% of treated sites1
Handles like an autograft
StrataGraft delivers viable cells to support the body’s own ability to heal
Designed with both dermal and epidermal layers composed of well-characterized human cells1
-
Metabolically active cells1
- Produces and secretes cytokines and other wound-healing factors
-
Growth factors and cytokines are known to be involved in wound repair and regeneration1
-
Does not permanently engraft and is gradually replaced by a patient’s own cells1
- DNA from StrataGraft was not detectable at month 3
- Attains durable wound closure
Provides durable wound closure (coprimary end point) StrataGraft treatment sites achieved durable wound closure without the need to create a second wound
83% (59 of 71) of StrataGraft-treated wounds and 86% (61 of 71) of autograft-treated wounds achieved durable closure at month 3; missing data were imputed as failures1,2,*
- For patients who completed the month 3 visit, 92% (59 of 64) demonstrated durable wound closure at the StrataGraft treatment site. For reference, 95% (61 of 64) demonstrated durable wound closure at the autograft treatment site2,*
- After month 3, DPT burn wounds treated with StrataGraft demonstrated equivalent wound reepithelialization to those treated with autograft2
- 3 patients did not achieve 100% reepithelialization at month 3. However, these patients did achieve >95% reepithelialization2
*Durable wound closure was defined as 100% skin reepithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements at 2 consecutive evaluations at least 2 weeks, but no greater than 5 months, apart. At early study sessions, 100% reepithelialization was observed more frequently for autograft treatment sites relative to StrataGraft treatment sites, likely due to different mechanisms of healing.2,3
Study design